Neuroanaesthesia & neurocritical care

Normobaric hyperoxia combined with endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in China (OPENS-2 trial): a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled trial

LancetPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

In patients with acute ischaemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation who were candidates for endovascular treatment, normobaric hyperoxia yielded superior functional outcomes at 90 days compared with the sham normobaric hyperoxia, without raising safety concerns.

Study context

Population
Patients aged 18–80 years within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke due to anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion, candidates for endovascular treatment, 26 comprehensive stroke centres in Chinarandomised
Participants
282 patients
Comparison
Normobaric hyperoxia vs Sham normobaric hyperoxia
  • Normobaric hyperoxian = 140
  • Sham normobaric hyperoxian = 142reference
Primary endpoint
Ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (ITT population)
Follow-up
Up to 90 days
Methodological detailsmulticentre, single-blind, sham-controlled
  • Multicentre
  • Single-blind
  • Sham-controlled

Primary result

mRS score

Adjusted common OR

1.65

95% CI 1.09–2.50

P = 0.018

By group

Normobaric hyperoxia

2

median · IQR 1–4

Sham normobaric hyperoxia

3

median · IQR 1–4

Normobaric hyperoxia vs Sham normobaric hyperoxia
adjusted common OR 1.65 (95% CI 1.09–2.50); P = 0.018

As reported in the abstract

Further findings

OutcomeNormobaric hyperoxiaSham normobaric hyperoxiaAdjusted risk difference (95% CI)
Death · up to 90 days10%12%−0.02 (−0.09 to 0.06)

Safety

OutcomeNormobaric hyperoxiaSham normobaric hyperoxiaAdjusted risk difference (95% CI)
Serious adverse events · up to 90 days20%23%−0.03 (−0.12 to 0.07)

Original publication

Normobaric hyperoxia combined with endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in China (OPENS-2 trial): a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. Published 8 February 2025. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02809-5

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.