ICU sedation, delirium & recovery

Open Visiting Policy and Delirium in Adult Patients in ICUs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Crit Care MedPublished Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Pooled result · Delirium occurrenceResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.48 95% CI 0.29–0.81

Authors' conclusion

Open/flexible ICU family presence may reduce delirium and shorten the duration of IMV slightly, without increasing infections or ICU mortality, although the certainty of evidence is low and heterogeneity remains substantial.

Study context

Population
Adult patients admitted to ICUs
Participants
3,861 patients · 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Comparison
Open or flexible vs. restricted ICU visiting policies
Outcome
Delirium occurrence
Methodological detailsrandom-effects models
  • Random-effects models

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.48

95% CI 0.29–0.81

Open/flexible family presence vs Restricted policies
RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.29–0.81)

Further pooled results

OutcomeMD (d) (95% CI)
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)Low certainty−0.36 (−0.46 to −0.26)
ICU length of stayVery low certainty4.21 (−4.65 to 13.07)
OutcomeRR (95% CI)
ICU mortalityVery low certainty0.88 (0.72–1.08)

Safety

OutcomeRR (95% CI)
Hospital-acquired infectionsLow certainty1.00 (0.81–1.23)

Original publication

Open Visiting Policy and Delirium in Adult Patients in ICUs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Crit Care Med. Published 15 October 2026. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000007393

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.