Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Operating Room Extubation After Cardiac Surgery: A Promising Practice, or a Product of Selection Bias?

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Prospective observational cohort study

Authors' conclusion

A standardized ORE protocol demonstrated feasibility and safety in selected cardiac surgery patients, with low reintubation rates, zero 30-day mortality, and reduced ICU length of stay.

Study context

Population
Elective cardiac surgery patients with CPB, single academic centre, November 2024–June 2025
Participants
628 patients
Exposure
Operating room extubation vs conventional intensive care unit (ICU) extubation
  • Operating room extubation (ORE)n = 171
  • Conventional ICU extubationn = 457reference
Outcome
Unadjusted ORE utilization rates, reintubation rates, 30-day mortality, ICU LOS and hospital LOS
Methodological detailssingle-centre, systematic protocol implementation
  • Single-centre
  • Systematic protocol implementation

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

GroupValueReintubation30-day mortalityMedian ICU stayMedian hospital stay
ORE27%5 (2.9%)026 hours5 days

ORE

Value27%
Reintubation5 (2.9%)
30-day mortality0
Median ICU stay26 hours
Median hospital stay5 days
Mean monthly ORE rate among eligible cases
28%
Median ICU stay ORE vs overall cohort
26 v 38 hours
Median hospital stay similar between groups
5 days
ORE patients relatively young, low comorbidity burden; median age
62 years

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Reintubation and 30-day mortality (ORE)
2.9% · 5 of 171

Original publication

Operating Room Extubation After Cardiac Surgery: A Promising Practice, or a Product of Selection Bias? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 14 January 2026. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2026.01.013

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.