Pain medicine

Postoperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis

Perioper Med (Lond)Published Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

We found that thoracic epidural analgesia was superior to intrathecal morphine, and intrathecal morphine was superior to non-neuraxial analgesia, in terms of reduced postoperative morphine requirements and the probability of adequate pain control in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing open, laparoscopic or laparoscopic converted to open upper gastrointestinal surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital (Sydney, Australia), November 2015–October 2020open 300, laparoscopic 120, converted 7
Participants
427 patients
Exposure
Thoracic epidural vs Intrathecal morphine vs Non-neuraxial
Outcome
Postoperative oral morphine equivalent consumption and probability of adequate pain control
Methodological detailssingle-centre, Bayesian mixed effect model
  • Single-centre
  • Bayesian mixed effect model

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

  • Intrathecal morphine superior to non-neuraxial analgesia (lower median oral morphine equivalent consumption, higher probability of adequate pain control); effect not sustained beyond POD 2
  • Thoracic epidural superior to both intrathecal and non-neuraxial analgesia for both primary outcomes

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Neuraxial technique use by surgical approach

Open surgery: thoracic epidural (n = 174)
58%
Open surgery: intrathecal morphine (n = 63)
21%
Laparoscopic: thoracic epidural (n = 4)
3%
Laparoscopic: intrathecal morphine (n = 14)
12%

Safety

Postoperative hypotension and technique failure with thoracic epidural
60% · 113 events

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Postoperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Perioper Med (Lond). Published 18 July 2023. doi:10.1186/s13741-023-00324-0

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.