Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness Using Carotid Ultrasound in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

Anesth AnalgPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Authors' conclusion

In this meta-analysis, we found that existing literature supports the ability of carotid ultrasound to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults.

Study context

Population
Mechanically ventilated patients (spontaneously ventilated patients excluded) receiving volume expansion
Participants
648 participants · 13 prospective studies
Outcome
Accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of carotid ultrasound parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness
Methodological detailshierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS), Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE)
  • Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models
  • QUADAS
  • GRADE

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of fluid responsiveness by ∆CDPV (meta-analysis)
GroupSensitivitySpecificity
∆CDPV0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.84)0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.90)

∆CDPV

Sensitivity0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.84)
Specificity0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.90)

Further pooled results

Overall quality of evidence was low; study design heterogeneity, incl. lack of clear parameter cutoffs, limited generalizability

Original publication

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness Using Carotid Ultrasound in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies. Anesth Analg. Published 30 January 2024. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000006820

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.