Sepsis & infection

Predictive performance of kinetic eGFR, midregional proadrenomedullin, and H3.1 nucleosomes for acute kidney disease in sepsis: a secondary analysis of a large multicentre randomized controlled trial

J Intensive CarePublished Secondary analysis of the SISPCT randomised trial

Primary result · AKDResult — go to the resultAdjusted odds ratio 1.17 95% CI 1.08–1.28

Authors' conclusion

In patients with sepsis, MR-proADM at baseline and dynamic changes in kinetic eGFR during the first week were independently associated with AKD, whereas histone H3.1 nucleosomes provided limited predictive value. Although multimarker models seemed to modestly improve baseline discrimination, this advantage was not sustained over time and added little clinical benefit beyond kinetic eGFR.

Study context

Population
Patients with sepsis, excluding pre-existing RRT or missing AKI data
Participants
690 patients
Comparison
Kinetic eGFR, midregional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and H3.1 nucleosomes, alone and combined, for prediction of acute kidney disease (AKD)
Primary endpoint
Acute kidney disease (AKD)
Methodological detailsmulticentre, prognostic biomarker study
  • Multicentre
  • Prognostic biomarker study

Primary result

AKD

Adjusted odds ratio

1.17

95% CI 1.08–1.28

P < 0.001

By group

MR-proADM

1.17

aOR at baseline

Combined model

AUC baseline
0.65
AUC day 2
0.70
AUC day 7
0.76
MR-proADM vs kinetic eGFR
aOR 1.17 (95% CI 1.08–1.28); P < 0.001

As reported in the abstract

AKD incidence
196 patients (28.4%)
At day 2 and day 7 only changes in kinetic eGFR independently associated with AKD
both p < 0.001

Further findings

OutcomeAKDNo AKDRR (95% CI)
90-day mortality by AKD55%24%2.3 (1.9–2.9)

Renal recovery

Biomarkers showed limited and inconsistent performance for prediction of renal recovery

Original publication

Predictive performance of kinetic eGFR, midregional proadrenomedullin, and H3.1 nucleosomes for acute kidney disease in sepsis: a secondary analysis of a large multicentre randomized controlled trial. J Intensive Care. Published 19 August 2026. doi:10.1186/s40560-026-00926-y

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.