Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Prevalence of perioperative functional disability using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 and associated adverse outcomes in surgical populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anaesth Crit Care Pain MedPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors' conclusion

Functional disability is prevalent in surgical patients and associated with adverse outcomes.

Study context

Population
Adult surgical patients (studies published January 2010 to July 13, 2024)
Participants
9,797 patients · 20 studies
Outcome
Prevalence of functional disability (WHODAS 2.0; ≥16% exceeds patient-acceptable levels, ≥25% and ≥35% clinically significant disability) at perioperative time points

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Pooled prevalence of functional disability
Preoperative, WHODAS ≥ 16% (exceeding patient-acceptable levels), 95% CI 23%, 42%
32%
Preoperative, WHODAS ≥ 25% (clinically significant), 95% CI 24%, 45%
34%
Preoperative, WHODAS ≥ 35% (clinically significant), 95% CI 11%, 35%
21%
Postoperative at 6 months, WHODAS ≥ 25%, 95% CI 8%, 23%
14%
Postoperative at 12 months, WHODAS ≥ 25%, 95% CI 14%, 17%
15%

Further pooled results

Adverse postoperative outcomes associated with preoperative functional disability

Preoperative functional disability associated with postoperative delirium, longer LOS, non-home discharge and greater postoperative pain

Original publication

Prevalence of perioperative functional disability using WHODAS 2.0 and associated adverse outcomes in surgical populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. Published 26 September 2025. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101623

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.