Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis

Perioper Med (Lond)Published Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies

Authors' conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests restrictive fluid therapy on the ward may be associated with an effect on postoperative complication rate.

Study context

Population
Adults after non-cardiac surgery, postoperative period on the clinical ward
Participants
883 adults · 3 RCTs · 4 non-randomised studies
Comparison
Restrictive vs conventional ward fluid regimen
Outcome
Overall complication rate
Methodological detailsRisk of bias moderate to high; methodological quality very low to moderate
  • Risk of bias moderate to high; methodological quality very low to moderate

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Restrictive vs ConventionalRelative risk (95% CI)P value
RCTs; I2 = 35%
0.46(0.23–0.95)
P < 0.03
Non-randomised studies; I2 = 45%
0.74(0.53–1.03)
P 0.07

Further pooled results

OutcomeOR (95% CI)P value
MortalityRestrictive vs Conventional · RCTs; I2 = 0%0.51 (0.05–4.90)P = 0.56
MortalityRestrictive vs Conventional · non-randomised studies; I2 = 0%0.30 (0.06–1.46)P = 0.14
OutcomeMD (days) (95% CI)P value
Postoperative LOSRestrictive vs Conventional · non-randomised studies; I2 = 0%- 1.81 (- 3.27 to - 0.35)P = 0.01
Postoperative LOSRestrictive vs Conventional · RCTs0.60 (- 0.75 to 1.95)P = 0.38

Original publication

Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis. Perioper Med (Lond). Published 21 September 2023. doi:10.1186/s13741-023-00337-9

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.