Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Standardized perioperative management in acute abdominal surgery: Swedish SMASH controlled study

Br J SurgPublished Prospective controlled study with historical control

Authors' conclusion

Standardized management protocols improved outcomes after emergency laparotomy.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing emergency laparotomy, 42 months (2018–2021)
Participants
1,344 adults
Exposure
Standardized perioperative management protocol vs historical control
  • Interventionn = 681
  • Controln = 663reference
Outcome
Mortality
Follow-up
30 days
Methodological detailsprospective intervention cohort, retrospective control group
  • Prospective intervention cohort
  • Retrospective control group

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

30-day mortality

Control

14.5 per cent

Intervention

10.7 per cent

P = 0.045

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

Duration of hospital stay

Mean hospital stay reduced, control vs intervention (days)
11.9 versus 10.2
P
P = 0.007

Duration of ICU stay

Mean ICU stay reduced, control vs intervention (days)
5.40 versus 3.12
P
P = 0.007

Antibiotic use

Increased with new protocol (per cent)
81.4 versus 94.7

Time from decision to operate to start of surgery

Reduced with new protocol (h)
3.80 versus 3.22

Anastomoses performed

Fewer anastomoses (per cent)
22.5 versus 16.8

Safety

Serious surgical complications (grade IIIb-V)

Lower rate, control vs intervention (per cent)
37.6 versus 27.3
P
P = <0.001

Original publication

Standardized perioperative management in acute abdominal surgery: Swedish SMASH controlled study. Br J Surg. Published 18 April 2023. doi:10.1093/bjs/znad081

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.