Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Meta-regression and Trial Sequential Analysis

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Pooled resultResult — go to the resultMD −8.53 mg 95% CI −14.39 to −2.68

Authors' conclusion

S-PIP provides modest early analgesic benefits after cardiac surgery.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing cardiac surgery (median sternotomy)
Participants
1,760 adults · 27 RCTs
Comparison
Superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) block vs standard or placebo analgesia
Outcome
Opioid use (MME)
Follow-up
24 hours
Methodological detailsrandom-effects model, trial sequential analysis, meta-regression, GRADE, Certainty of evidence moderate to very low (GRADE)
  • Random-effects model
  • Trial sequential analysis
  • Meta-regression
  • GRADE
  • Certainty of evidence moderate to very low (GRADE)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

MD

−8.53 mg

95% CI −14.39 to −2.68

S-PIP vs Control
MD −8.53 mg (95% CI −14.39 to −2.68)

Further pooled results

Early pain scores, rescue analgesic use, extubation time, ICU stay

Lower early pain scores, reduced rescue analgesic use, shorter extubation time and ICU stay with S-PIP

Hospital stay, chronic postsurgical pain

No meaningful differences

Safety

PONV

No meaningful difference

Original publication

Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Meta-regression and Trial Sequential Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 19 January 2026. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2026.01.017

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.