Organ support & nutrition

Age-associated outcomes in cardiogenic shock supported with microaxial flow pumps

Ann Intensive CarePublished Retrospective multicentre registry cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In this European registry, increasing age was associated with higher mortality and lower observed myocardial recovery among patients with cardiogenic shock supported with mAFP.

Study context

Population
Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with micro-Axial Flow Pump (mAFP) (Impella CP, 5.0 and 5.5), 11 European centers, 2010–2023
Participants
1,043 patients
Exposure
Age quartiles Q2, Q3, Q4 vs Q1
Outcome
All-cause mortality
Follow-up
30 days
Methodological details11 European centers, Fine-Gray competing risks model, restricted cubic spline analysis
  • 11 European centers
  • Fine-Gray competing risks model
  • Restricted cubic spline analysis

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

30-day all-cause mortality
Adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (95% CI)P value
Q3 vs Q1
1.66(1.19–2.34)
P < 0.01for trend
Q4 vs Q1
1.87(1.34–2.62)
P < 0.01for trend
Each additional year of age3.2% increase in 30-day mortality risk per year
1.032(1.017–1.047)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomesHR (CI)P value
1-year mortalityQ3 vs Q1 · Fine-Gray competing risks model1.78 (1.31–2.41)P for trend < 0.01
1-year mortalityQ4 vs Q1 · Fine-Gray competing risks model2.08 (1.54–2.80)P for trend < 0.01
OutcomeQ1Q4P value
Major LVEF recovery (≥10 percentage points)Q4 vs Q174.5%41.9%P < 0.01
Major left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery (≥10 percentage points) — Reduction in LVEF improvement per year of age
0.40 percentage-point

Major LVEF recovery (≥10 percentage points)

Major LVEF recovery declined progressively with age

Baseline characteristics, Q4 vs Q1

Q4 more frequently female, higher comorbidity burden, less intensive support than Q1

Original publication

Age-associated outcomes in cardiogenic shock supported with microaxial flow pumps. Ann Intensive Care. Published 24 June 2026. doi:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100104

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.