Anesthetic drugs & techniques

Anesthetic Choice for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Placement and Lead Removal: A National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry Analysis

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

General anesthesia still has a strong presence in the anesthetic management of both CIED placement and transvenous lead removal. Anesthetic choice, however, varies with patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and geographic region.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) (permanent pacemaker or ICD) placement or transvenous lead removal, 2010–2021, National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry
Participants
87,530 / 76,140 / 2,568 / 4,861
Exposure
MAC vs GA for CIED placement and transvenous lead removal
  • Pacemaker placementn = 87,530
  • ICD placementn = 76,140
  • Pacemaker lead removaln = 2,568
  • ICD lead extractionn = 4,861
Outcome
Anesthetic type (MAC vs GA) and its predictors
Methodological detailsregistry analysis, multivariate models
  • Registry analysis
  • Multivariate models

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Proportion receiving MAC

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Predictors of MAC: age (per 1-year increase)

Increase in MAC, pacemaker placement (p < 0.0001)
2%
Increase in MAC, ICD placement (p < 0.0001)
1%
Increase in MAC, pacemaker lead removal (p = 0.0003)
2%

Predictors of MAC: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status

ASA ≤III more likely to receive MAC, pacemaker placement (p = 0.0013)
7%
ASA ≥IV more likely to receive MAC, ICD placement (p = 0.0144)
5%
ASA ≤III more likely to receive MAC, pacemaker lead removal (p = 0.0247)
27%

Predictors of MAC: region

Northeast more likely to receive MAC than West for all groups (p < 0.0024)

Predictors of MAC: sex

Male less likely to receive MAC for pacemaker lead removal (p = 0.0378)
24%

Predictors of MAC: annual lead removal volume (per 10 additional)

Decrease in MAC, pacemaker lead removal (p = 0.0271) and ICD lead removal (p < 0.0001)
2%

Original publication

Anesthetic Choice for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Placement and Lead Removal: A National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 29 July 2023. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2023.07.026

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.