Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Comparative efficacy of balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline on delayed graft function and perioperative outcomes in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Br J AnaesthPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Pooled result · Delayed graft functionResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.82 95% CI 0.69–0.98

Authors' conclusion

Balanced crystalloid intravenous fluid therapy reduced delayed graft function incidence and maintained more favourable serum chemistry profiles compared with 0.9% saline in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. However, crystalloid type did not significantly influence vasopressor requirements and length of hospital stay.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing kidney transplantation
Participants
1,717 adults · 11 RCTs
Comparison
Balanced crystalloids vs 0.9% saline intraoperatively
Outcome
Delayed graft function incidence
Methodological detailsrandom-effects model, GRADE
  • Random-effects model
  • GRADE

Pooled result

Delayed graft function

Relative risk

0.82

95% CI 0.69–0.98

P = 0.01

Balanced fluids vs 0.9% saline
RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.69–0.98); P = 0.01

As reported in the abstract

Further pooled results

Postoperative serum chemistry

Higher serum pH, higher bicarbonate and lower chloride with balanced crystalloids

Vasopressor requirements, hospital LOS, serum creatinine

Effects uncertain

Original publication

Comparative efficacy of balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline on delayed graft function and perioperative outcomes in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. Published 13 September 2024. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.008

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.