Anesthetic drugs & techniques

Comparing oxygen therapies for hypoxemia prevention during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

J Clin AnesthPublished Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

During gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation, all other advanced oxygen therapies were found to be more efficacious than nasal cannula. NIPPV and WNJT appear to be the most efficacious oxygen therapy for preventing hypoxemia.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18 years) undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation
Participants
7,552 adults · 27 randomized clinical trials (RCTs)
Comparison
Oxygen therapies vs NC
Outcome
Incidence of hypoxemia (SpO2)
Methodological detailsrandom-effects, Risk of bias by Cochrane guidance; evidence quality by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)
  • Random-effects
  • Risk of bias by Cochrane guidance; evidence quality by GRADE

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Each group vs NCOdds ratio (95% CI)
NIPPV95% PrI: 0.06-0.41
0.16(0.08–0.31)
WNJT95% PrI: 0.07-0.42
0.17(0.10–0.30)

Original publication

Comparing oxygen therapies for hypoxemia prevention during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. Published 17 August 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111586

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.