Perioperative medicine & outcomes
A comparison between invasive and noninvasive measurement of the Hypotension Prediction Index: A post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study
Primary result · AUC for HPI predictionsResult — go to the resultDifference 1.1 % 95% CI −3.9 to 6.1Authors' conclusion
Noninvasive HPI is reliably accessible to clinicians during noncardiac surgery, showing comparable accuracy in HPI probabilities and the potential for additional response time.
Study context
- Population
- Adult noncardiac surgery patients scheduled for elective procedures over 2 h, academic hospital in the Netherlands, 2018–202091 analysed
- Participants
- 105 patients
- Comparison
- Noninvasive vs invasive BP-derived Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI)
- Primary endpoint
- Difference in AUC of HPI predictions between the two datasets
Methodological detailssingle-centre
- Single-centre
Primary result
AUC for HPI predictions
Difference
1.1 %
95% CI −3.9 to 6.1
P = 0.673
By group
Noninvasive HPI vs Invasive HPI
difference 1.1 % (95% CI −3.9 to 6.1); P = 0.673
As reported in the abstract
Further findings
- Significantly longer time-to-event estimations for higher HPI values with noninvasive HPI
Original publication
A comparison between invasive and noninvasive measurement of the Hypotension Prediction Index: A post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. Published 16 October 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →