Continuous glucose monitoring versus conventional glucose monitoring in the ICU: A randomized controlled trial
Authors' conclusion
Compared with conventional POCM, CGMS did not decrease the 28-day mortality in critically ill participants with diabetes or stress-induced hyperglycemia.
Study context
- Population
- Critically ill patients with diabetes or stress-induced hyperglycemia in the ICU
- Participants
- 48 vs 48
- Comparison
- Continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) vs point-of-care monitoring (POCM)
- CGMSn = 48
- POCMn = 48reference
- Primary endpoint
- Mortality after ICU admission
- Follow-up
- 28 days
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
P = 0.25
Further findings
| Outcome | P value |
|---|---|
| Mean glucose, time-weighted average glucose, glucose SD and time in range (3.9-10.0)All significantly improved in the CGMS group | P < 0.05 |
Original publication
Continuous glucose monitoring versus conventional glucose monitoring in the ICU: A randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. Published 5 August 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →