Respiratory failure & ventilation

Early physiologic changes after awake prone positioning predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Intensive Care MedPublished Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study

Primary result · ROX index (main physiologic predictor)Result — go to the resultOdds ratio 0.37 95% CI 0.25–0.54

Authors' conclusion

Relative changes in the ROX index within 6 h of the first awake prone positioning session along with other known predictive factors are associated with intubation and mortality at day 7.

Study context

Population
Adults with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure treated with awake prone positioning
Participants
244 adults
Comparison
Treatment failure vs no failure after awake prone positioning
  • Failuren = 71
Primary endpoint
Treatment failure (endotracheal intubation and/or death) predicted by relative changes in physiological variables within first 6 h of first awake prone positioning session
Follow-up
7 days

Primary result

ROX index (main physiologic predictor)

Odds ratio

0.37

95% CI 0.25–0.54

Relative increase of ROX index vs baseline
OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.25–0.54)

Every 25% increase, as printed

As reported in the abstract

Further findings

Mean

OutcomeFailureNo failureP value
ROX index at baseline5 (SD 1.4)6.6 (SD 2.2)P < 0.0001
ROX index within 6 h of prone positioning · within 6 h5.6 (SD 1.7)8.7 (SD 2.8)P < 0.0001
Awake prone positioning failure rate · 7 days
29% · 71

Original publication

Early physiologic changes after awake prone positioning predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. Published 14 November 2024. doi:10.1007/s00134-024-07690-3

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.