Pediatric anesthesia & critical care

Effect of high positive end-expiratory pressure on perioperative atelectasis in neonates and small infants (0–6 months) with healthy lungs: A randomized controlled trial

Anaesth Crit Care Pain MedPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Although high PEEP is more effective than conventional PEEP in reducing intraoperative atelectasis, it does not appear to provide any postoperative benefits.

Study context

Population
Neonates and small infants aged 0–6 months with healthy lungs undergoing surgery
Participants
44 neonates · 1,056 lung ultrasound (LUS) images
Comparison
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O vs PEEP 8 cmH2O
Primary endpoint
LUS score at four time points (after intubation, end of surgery, 30 min after extubation, 24 h postoperatively)

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Total LUS score at end of surgery (T2) · End of surgery

PEEP 5 cmH2O

14.5

unspecified 5.1

PEEP 8 cmH2O

11.4

unspecified 4.4

P = 0.039

Secondary outcomes

Intraoperative driving pressure · During surgery

P = 0.010

Incidence of PPCs · First 7 postoperative days

Remained low in both groups

Original publication

Effect of high positive end-expiratory pressure on perioperative atelectasis in neonates and small infants (0–6 months) with healthy lungs: A randomized controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. Published 19 November 2025. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101679

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.