Obstetric anesthesia

Effect of an oxytocin protocol on secondary uterotonic use in patients undergoing Cesarean delivery

Can J AnaesthPublished Retrospective before-and-after study

Main findingResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 1.33 95% CI 1.04–1.70

Authors' conclusion

Patients in the modified rule of threes oxytocin protocol group were more likely to receive a secondary uterotonic than those in the preprotocol group. Estimated blood loss and transfusion outcomes were similar.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing Cesarean deliveryCesarean deliveries in 3,637 patients
Participants
4,010 patients
Exposure
Postprotocol vs Preprotocol
  • Postprotocoln = 1,748
  • Preprotocoln = 2,262reference
Outcome
Secondary uterotonic use

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Odds ratio

1.33

95% CI 1.04–1.70

P = 0.02

Postprotocol vs Preprotocol
OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.04–1.70); P = 0.02

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeOR (95% CI)P value
Estimated blood loss greater than 1,000 mL0.64 (0.50–0.84)P = 0.001

Blood transfusion

Postprotocol less likely to receive a blood transfusion

Composite of transfusion or hemoglobin < 8 g·dL-1

Similar in the two groups
OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.11; P = 0.25)

Original publication

Effect of an oxytocin protocol on secondary uterotonic use in patients undergoing Cesarean delivery. Can J Anaesth. Published 6 June 2023. doi:10.1007/s12630-023-02496-1

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.