Anesthetic drugs & techniques

Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Anesth AnalgPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary result · Pulmonary complications, volatile (sevoflurane or desflurane) vs propofolResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 0.63 95% CI 0.44–0.91

Authors' conclusion

In patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, the use of volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) resulted in the reduced risk and severity of pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days as compared to propofol-based intravenous anesthesia.

Study context

Population
Patients scheduled for minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer553 analysed
Participants
558 patients
Comparison
Volatile anesthesia vs propofol-based intravenous anesthesia
  • Sevofluranen = 185
  • Desfluranen = 185
  • Propofoln = 183reference
Primary endpoint
Incidence of pulmonary complications (collapsed composite:
  • Respiratory infection
  • Pleural effusion
  • Pneumothorax
  • Atelectasis
  • Respiratory failure
  • Bronchospasm
  • PE
  • Aspiration pneumonitis)
Follow-up
Within 7 days postoperatively
Methodological detailsthree-arm
  • Three-arm

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Pulmonary complications, volatile (sevoflurane or desflurane) vs propofol

Odds ratio

0.63

95% CI 0.44–0.91

P = 0.013

By group

Volatile (sevoflurane or desflurane) vs Propofol
OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.44–0.91); P = 0.013

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeP value
Severity grade of pulmonary complicationsVolatile (sevoflurane or desflurane) vs Propofol · lower severity with volatileP = 0.035

Other secondary outcomes

No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups

Original publication

Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. Published 9 February 2024. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000006814

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.