Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron supplementation for perioperative iron deficiency anemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

J Clin AnesthPublished Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Authors' conclusion

FCM improves perioperative Hb concentrations and reduces transfusion requirements. All intravenous iron preparations demonstrated acceptable safety profiles.

Study context

Population
Perioperative patients with iron deficiency anemia receiving intravenous iron
Participants
4,688 patients · 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Comparison
Intravenous iron preparations vs placebo
Outcome
Hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations
Methodological detailsBayesian network meta-analysis (NMA)
  • Bayesian NMA

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

CrI
Each group vs placeboMD, g/dL (95 % CrI)
FCM
0.76(0.56–0.96)
IIM
0.65(0.33–0.97)

Further pooled results

OutcomeOR (95 % CrI)
Transfusion requirementsFCM vs Placebo · CrI0.72 (0.55–0.91)

Transfusion requirements

Only ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) reduced transfusion requirements

Quality of life (QoL) (descriptive analysis)

Improved QoL with FCM vs placebo for fatigue and dyspnea (QLQ-C30) and physical functioning (SF-36)

NMA consistency

No significant inconsistencies between direct and indirect evidence

Safety

No significant differences in adverse events between the groups

Original publication

Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron supplementation for perioperative iron deficiency anemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. Published 3 November 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.112062

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.