Respiratory failure & ventilation

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-assessed ventilation–perfusion responses to prone positioning and inhaled nitric oxide in mechanically ventilated COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): a prospective sequential study

J Intensive CarePublished Prospective sequential physiological study

Authors' conclusion

Both prone positioning and iNO improved oxygenation in moderate-to-severe COVID-19-related ARDS. Within the EIT-assessed thoracic slice, these improvements were accompanied by better regional V/Q matching, which was mainly perfusion-related rather than ventilation-related and suggests limited recruitability of the imaged region; the effect of iNO on regional V/Q matching was attenuated in the prone position.

Study context

Population
Mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19-related ARDScompleted all study phases
Participants
28 participants
Exposure
Supine vs prone ventilation, each with and without inhaled nitric oxide (iNO)
Outcome
Prespecified within-patient contrasts across the four sequential conditions (primary analyses)
Methodological detailswithin-patient contrasts, exploratory difference-in-differences analyses
  • Within-patient contrasts
  • Exploratory difference-in-differences analyses

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

EIT V/Q metrics within the imaged thoracic slice
Supine position ventilation (SPV) + iNO vs SPV: change in global non-perfused fraction
−7.28%
SPV + iNO vs SPV: change in wasted ventilation
−8.14%
SPV + iNO vs SPV: change in wasted perfusion
−5.89%
PPV: change in global non-perfused fraction
−8.76%
PPV + iNO: change in dorsal low V/Q compartment
+ 4.01%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Oxygenation (PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, FiO2 requirement)

SPV + iNO and PPV significantly increased PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 vs SPV
PPV + iNO further improved oxygenation and reduced FiO2 requirements

Position-dependent response to iNO (difference-in-differences)

Body position did not significantly modify oxygenation response to iNO but significantly altered EIT-derived V/Q responses (attenuated in prone position)
  • Exploratory

Safety

Hemodynamics and respiratory mechanics

Remained stable across all four conditions

Original publication

EIT-assessed ventilation–perfusion responses to prone positioning and inhaled nitric oxide in mechanically ventilated COVID-19-related ARDS: a prospective sequential study. J Intensive Care. Published 22 July 2026. doi:10.1186/s40560-026-00918-y

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.