Respiratory failure & ventilation

Higher versus lower oxygenation targets in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients: A rapid practice guideline

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Rapid practice guideline

Methodological detailsGRADE approach, Evidence-to-Decision framework, Panel of 27 international panelists, Evidence base: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials with 10,248 participants, Little to no difference between higher vs lower oxygenation targets for all outcomes with available data, incl. all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, stroke, functional outcomes, cognition, health-related quality of life (very low certainty of evidence)
  • GRADE approach
  • Evidence-to-Decision framework
  • Panel of 27 international panelists
  • Evidence base: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials with 10,248 participants
  • Little to no difference between higher vs lower oxygenation targets for all outcomes with available data, incl. all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, stroke, functional outcomes, cognition, health-related quality of life (very low certainty of evidence)

Recommendations

As issued by the authors

  1. conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence

    We suggest against the routine use of higher oxygenation targets in adult ICU patients. Remark: an oxygenation target of SpO2 88%-92% or PaO2 8 kPa/60 mmHg is relevant and safe for most adult ICU patients.

Original publication

Higher versus lower oxygenation targets in adult ICU patients: A rapid practice guideline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 23 December 2023. doi:10.1111/aas.14366

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.