Airway management

Hospital and long-term outcomes for subglottic suction and polyurethane cuff versus standard endotracheal tubes in emergency intubation (PreVent 2): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial

Lancet Respir MedPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

At 6-month follow-up, neither quality of life, cognitive function, nor laryngeal injury differed between groups.

Study context

Population
Adults requiring emergency endotracheal intubation in the ED or elsewhere in hospital for acute respiratory distress or failure (OHSU and YNHH, USA)157 completed 6-month visit
Participants
1,068 adults
Comparison
PU-EVAC vs PVC
  • PU-EVACn = 535
  • PVCn = 533reference
Primary endpoint
Coprimary: laryngeal injury, quality of life (SF-36 PCS and MCS), cognitive function
Follow-up
6 months
Methodological detailsphase 2, two centres, 1:1 randomisation
  • Phase 2
  • Two centres
  • 1:1 randomisation

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Coprimary endpoints
PU-EVAC vs PVCEstimate (95% CI)P value
Laryngeal injury
risk difference 0.11(−0.03 to 0.20)
P = 0.098
PCS
mean difference −0.52(−4.21 to 3.17)
P = 0.78
MCS
mean difference −2.98(−7.03 to 1.07)
P = 0.15
Cognitive impairment
risk difference 0.05(−0.07 to 0.17)
P = 0.44

Secondary outcomes

OutcomePU-EVACPVCRisk difference
Infection-related ventilator-associated complications (IVAC)8%6%0.02 (95% CI −0.01 to 0.05)
Possible VAP6%5%0.01 (CI −0.02 to 0.04)

Death · 6 months

  • Death: 558 died in total

Original publication

Hospital and long-term outcomes for subglottic suction and polyurethane cuff versus standard endotracheal tubes in emergency intubation (PreVent 2): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med. Published 27 November 2025. doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00294-2

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.