Respiratory failure & ventilation

Implementation of Lung-Protective Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure*

Crit Care MedPublished Stepped wedge type II hybrid implementation/effectiveness trial

Authors' conclusion

We observed improved adherence to optimal ventilator management with implementation of a computerized protocol and reduction in the number of patients receiving tidal volumes greater than 8 mL/kg. We did not observe improvement in clinical outcomes.

Study context

Population
Adults ≥18 y with mechanical ventilation initiated in the ED or ICU, with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 12 hospitals of an integrated healthcare system3,282 (38%) with ARDS
Participants
8,692 adults
Comparison
After vs before implementation of a computerized low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) protocol
Outcome
Ventilator-free days (VFDs); primary process outcome: median initial set tidal volume
Follow-up
Day 28
Methodological detailspragmatic, nonrandomized, multicentre (12 hospitals)
  • Pragmatic
  • Nonrandomized
  • Multicentre (12 hospitals)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

VFDs to day 28

No difference in VFD

1.06

aOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.91–1.24p = 0.44

Secondary outcomes

Initial set tidal volume (primary process outcome)

Decreased from median 6.1 mL/kg (IQR 6.0-6.8) to 6.0 mL/kg (IQR 6.0-6.6) after implementation; p = 0.009
  • mL/kg predicted body weight

Patients receiving LTVV (tidal volume ≤ 6.5 mL/kg)

Increased from 69.8% (n = 1,721) to 72.5% (n = 1,846) after implementation; p = 0.036

Patients receiving >8 mL/kg initial set tidal volume

Reduced from 9.0% (n = 222) to 6.7% (n = 174) after implementation; p = 0.005

Day 1 PEEP (ARDS subgroup)

Increased from 6.7 to 8.0 cm H 2 O; p < 0.001

LOS and mortality (main cohort and ARDS subgroup)

No difference in LOS or mortality, in the main cohort or the ARDS subgroup

Original publication

Implementation of Lung-Protective Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure*. Crit Care Med. Published 29 March 2023. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005840

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.