Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and comparative frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ann Intensive CarePublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

Our analysis did not demonstrate a significant benefit in early mortality with a liberal transfusion strategy compared to a restrictive strategy for AMI, low certainty of evidence. Liberal transfusion may reduce the risk of the composite outcome death or MI, with very low certainty of evidence.

Study context

Population
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) (AMI)
Participants
4,324 patients · 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Comparison
Liberal vs restrictive transfusion strategy
Outcome
Latest measured mortality within 90 days following MI
Follow-up
Within 90 days
Methodological detailsfrequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis, fixed-effect and random-effects models, sensitivity analysis (low risk of bias studies only; Bayesian)
  • Frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis
  • Fixed-effect and random-effects models
  • Sensitivity analysis (low risk of bias studies only; Bayesian)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Latest measured mortality within 90 days after MI

Mortality, fixed-effect model: RR (95% CI 0.95-1.40), no significant reduction

1.16

Mortality, random-effects model: RR (95% CI 0.67-1.91), no significant reduction

1.13

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR (95% CI)
Composite of death or MIFixed-effect and random-effects models; I2 = 0%, p = 0.46 · GRADE: very low certainty of evidence · primarily driven by a single study1.18 (1.01–1.37)

Cardiac mortality

Fixed-effects model: significant RR
1.42 (95% CI 1.07-1.88)
Random-effects model: non-significant RR
1.05 (95% CI 0.36-3.80)

Other secondary endpoints (recurrent MI, stroke, unplanned revascularization)

No statistically significant results

Original publication

Liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and comparative frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intensive Care. Published 28 September 2024. doi:10.1186/s13613-024-01376-1

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.