Pain medicine

Longitudinal outcomes following temporary 60-day percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain: a retrospective analysis

Reg Anesth Pain MedPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Patients with percutaneous 60-day PNS showed ≥30% pain reduction in 24% of patients using the primary outcome (median postprocedural NRS), with responder rates spanning 8%-14% across sensitivity analyses depending on the postprocedural pain anchor and threshold applied.

Study context

Population
Patients with chronic pain undergoing temporary 60-day percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, April 2021–September 2025102 with complete pain data
Participants
125 patients
Outcome
Treatment response: ≥30% reduction from day-of-procedure to median postprocedural NRS pain score
Methodological detailslinear mixed-effects models
  • Linear mixed-effects models

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Responders (≥30% reduction, median postprocedural NRS)

PNS

24%

24

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeValues
Responders, ≥50% threshold, median postprocedural NRS (sensitivity analysis)PNS 14%
Responders, ≥30% threshold, maximum postprocedural NRS (sensitivity analysis)PNS 13%
Responders, ≥50% threshold, maximum postprocedural NRS (sensitivity analysis)PNS 8%
  • Responders, ≥50% threshold, median postprocedural Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (sensitivity analysis): 102 with complete pain score data
  • Responders, ≥30% threshold, maximum postprocedural NRS (sensitivity analysis): 102 with complete pain score data
  • Responders, ≥50% threshold, maximum postprocedural NRS (sensitivity analysis): 102 with complete pain score data

Change in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) among patients with baseline opioid use (n=35, 28%) · 1 year

Documentable change in MME
7
Increase in MME
5
Decrease in MME
2
  • Most patients opioid-naïve at baseline

At least one comorbid mental health diagnosis (all patients)

Patients with ≥1 comorbid mental health diagnosis
54%

Safety

OutcomeValues
Early PNS device removalPNS 19%
Early PNS device removal — Lack of efficacy, worsening pain or new paresthesia
11 (9%)
Early PNS device removal — Other reasons (lead migration/dislodgement, lead fracture, removal for MRI, infection, skin irritation)
13 (10%)
Early PNS device removal — Early removal, non-responders vs responders
22% vs 13%

Original publication

Longitudinal outcomes following temporary 60-day percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain: a retrospective analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published 24 July 2026. doi:10.1136/rapm-2026-108123

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.