Non-contact (touchless) monitoring of respiratory rate in a challenging anesthesia setting using a depth camera
Authors' conclusion
We have demonstrated the ability to continuously track respiratory rate during challenging conditions within an anesthesia setting using our non-contact, touchless, monitoring technology.
Study context
- Population
- Healthy volunteers in an anesthesia setting (pre-, intra- and post-anesthesia)
- Participants
- 34 healthy volunteers
- Comparison
- RRdepth vs RRref
- Outcome
- RRdepth vs RRref accuracy, combined data set
Methodological detailsopportunistic data collection from two separate studies
- Opportunistic data collection from two separate studies
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Overall RMSD accuracy [bias], combined data set
1.92 [0.30] breaths/min
Further findings
RMSD accuracy [bias], pre-anesthesia
- RMSD accuracy [bias]
- 1.71 [0.15] breaths/min
RMSD accuracy [bias], intra-anesthesia
- RMSD accuracy [bias]
- 1.95 [0.39] breaths/min
RMSD accuracy [bias], post-anesthesia
- RMSD accuracy [bias]
- 2.13 [0.08] breaths/min
Original publication
Non-contact (touchless) monitoring of respiratory rate in a challenging anesthesia setting using a depth camera. J Clin Monit Comput. Published 10 July 2025. doi:10. 1007/ s10877-025-01319-6
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →