Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range during major noncardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial

J Clin AnesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.24 95% CI 0.13–0.41

Authors' conclusion

Compared with routine care, SpHb-guided management resulted in significantly lower rates of hemoglobin deviation outside the target range intraoperatively in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgeries with a potential risk of hemorrhage.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing elective major noncardiac surgery with a potential risk of hemorrhage, university hospital
Participants
130 patients
Comparison
SpHb-guided management vs usual care
Primary endpoint
Rate of deviation of laboratory total hemoglobin from target range (8-14 g/dL): tests revealing deviation / total laboratory tests during surgery
Follow-up
Intraoperative
Methodological detailssingle-centre, prospective
  • Single-centre
  • Prospective

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.24

95% CI 0.13–0.41

P < 0.001

Events by treatment group

SpHb vs Control
RR 0.24 (95% CI 0.13–0.41); P < 0.001

Further findings

Patients receiving intraoperative RBC transfusion · no significant difference

P = 0.201

Unnecessary RBC preparation (>2 units)

P = 0.024

Median

OutcomeSpHbControlP value
Number of point-of-care blood tests2 (IQR 1–4)4 (IQR 2–5)P < 0.001

Original publication

Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range during major noncardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. Published 20 November 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111326

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.