Anaesthetic drugs & techniques

Postoperative Hoarseness After General Anesthesia Referred for Otolaryngological Consultation: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

Anesth AnalgPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

The incidence of postoperative hoarseness referred for otolaryngological consultation was ~1.5/1000. Within the referral cohort, nasogastric tube placement was most strongly associated with hoarseness versus other laryngopharyngeal complaints and, together with TEE, longer surgical duration, double-lumen tube insertion, and female sex, was associated with greater vocal fold injury severity.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing GA, October 2015–September 2025, referred to the Otolaryngology Department with postoperative laryngopharyngeal complaints1,185 referred
Participants
676,641 patients
Exposure
Hoarseness vs Other laryngopharyngeal complaints
  • Hoarsenessn = 958
Outcome
Postoperative hoarseness referred for otolaryngological consultation (incidence and associated factors)
Methodological detailssingle-centre, multivariable logistic regression, expanded-cohort sensitivity analysis
  • Single-centre
  • Multivariable logistic regression
  • Expanded-cohort sensitivity analysis

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Incidence of referred postoperative hoarseness and factors vs other complaints
Hoarseness vs other laryngopharyngeal complaints
Odds ratio (95% CI)P value
Nasogastric tube placement
2.34(1.63–3.38)
P < 0.001
TEE
1.84(1.15–3.02)
P = 0.014
Incidence of referred postoperative hoarseness
958/676,641 (0.142%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

Greater vocal fold injury severity

EstimateP value
Nasogastric tube placementOrdinal logistic regressionOR 2.11 (95% CI 1.61–2.78)P < 0.001
TEEOrdinal logistic regressionOR 1.61 (95% CI 1.15–2.25)P = 0.006
Longer surgical durationOrdinal logistic regressionOR 1.10 /h (95% CI 1.03–1.18)P = 0.003
Double-lumen tubeOrdinal logistic regressionOR 1.55 (95% CI 1.04–2.31)P = 0.033
Female sexOrdinal logistic regressionOR 1.41 (95% CI 1.11–1.80)P = 0.005

Nasogastric tube placement and hoarseness, expanded-cohort sensitivity analysis

OR (95% CI)P value
Nasogastric tube placementn = 1438; 480 controls · sensitivity analysis4.20 (3.00–5.95)P < 0.001

Recovery among patients with hoarseness

Delayed first consultation (≥6 days after symptom onset) and greater vocal fold injury severity associated with slower recovery
both P < .001

Original publication

Postoperative Hoarseness After General Anesthesia Referred for Otolaryngological Consultation: A 10-Year Retrospective Study. Anesth Analg. Published 21 September 2026. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000008300

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.