Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Predictive Ability of Stroke Volume Changes Following Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Reduction on Fluid Responsiveness During One-Lung Ventilation

Anesth AnalgPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

During OLV, the relative increase in SV elicited by the PEEP test predicted fluid responsiveness as defined by the Trendelenburg maneuver.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing elective lung resection requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV), closed-chest conditions38 analysed
Participants
43 adults
Comparison
ΔSVPEEP test vs ΔMAPPEEP test vs stroke volume variation (SVV)
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of the ΔSVPEEP test for predicting fluid responsiveness (≥10% stroke volume (SV) increase after 15° head-down tilt)
Methodological detailssingle-centre, prospective interventional
  • Single-centre
  • Prospective interventional

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of fluid responsiveness
Test or modelAUCOptimal cutoffSensitivitySpecificity
ΔSVPEEP test0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P < .0001)8.6%94.4% (95% CI, 72.7-99.9)80.0% (95% CI, 56.3-94.3)

ΔSVPEEP test

AUC0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P < .0001)
Optimal cutoff8.6%
Sensitivity94.4% (95% CI, 72.7-99.9)
Specificity80.0% (95% CI, 56.3-94.3)

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeΔMAPPEEP testSVVP value
ΔSVPEEP test, responders vs nonrespondersP < 0.0001
Prediction of fluid responsiveness by ΔMAPPEEP test and SVV
AUC0.84 (95% CI, 0.68-0.94; P < .0001)0.64 (95% CI, 0.47-0.79; P = .12)
Gray zone for ΔSVPEEP test
36.8% · 14 events
  • ΔSVPEEP test, responders vs nonresponders: Responders 16.7% ± 8.9
  • ΔSVPEEP test, responders vs nonresponders: Nonresponders 4.6% ± 4.3
  • Gray zone for ΔSVPEEP test: 14 of 38 patients within gray zone

Prediction of fluid responsiveness by ΔMAPPEEP test and SVV

SVV not predictive

Original publication

Predictive Ability of Stroke Volume Changes Following Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Reduction on Fluid Responsiveness During One-Lung Ventilation. Anesth Analg. Published 10 June 2026. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000008149

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.