Pressure‐controlled versus manual facemask ventilation for anaesthetic induction in adults: A randomised controlled non‐inferiority trial
Primary resultResult — go to the resultDifference in means 1.1 ventilatory attempts/breaths 99% CI −1.0 to 3.1Authors' conclusion
Following induction of general anaesthesia, PC-FMV with PEEP was used without delaying a patent airway as confirmed with capnography, if moderate pressures were used.
Study context
- Population
- Adults scheduled for elective day-case surgery under GA, BMI 18.5–29.9 kg m-2, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–III, without anticipated difficult FMV
- Participants
- 70 adults
- Comparison
- Pressure-controlled face mask ventilation (PC-FMV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs Manual FMV
- Primary endpoint
- Number of ventilatory attempts until confirmation of a patent airway (return of at least 1.3 kPa CO2)
Methodological detailssingle-centre, non-inferiority
- Single-centre
- Non-inferiority
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Difference in means
1.1 ventilatory attempts/breaths
99% CI −1.0 to 3.1
By group
PC-FMV with PEEP vs Manual FMV
difference in means 1.1 ventilatory attempts/breaths (99% CI −1.0 to 3.1)
Original publication
Pressure‐controlled versus manual facemask ventilation for anaesthetic induction in adults: A randomised controlled non‐inferiority trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 21 July 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →