Sepsis & infection

Prolonged vs intermittent intravenous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for patients with sepsis: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Ann Intensive CarePublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Pooled resultResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.82 95% CI 0.70–0.96

Authors' conclusion

Prolonged intravenous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with sepsis was associated with short-term survival benefits and higher clinical cure.

Study context

Population
Patients with sepsis
Participants
1,762 patients · 9 studies
Comparison
Prolonged vs intermittent IV infusion of β-lactam antibiotics
Outcome
All-cause mortality
Follow-up
Within 30 days
Methodological detailstrial sequential analysis, prospectively registered
  • Trial sequential analysis
  • Prospectively registered

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.82

95% CI 0.70–0.96

P = 0.01

Prolonged vs Intermittent
RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.70–0.96); P = 0.01

Further pooled results

Hospital mortality, ICU mortality, clinical cure

Prolonged infusion associated with lower hospital and ICU mortality and higher clinical cure

90-day mortality, emergence of resistant bacteria

No significant reduction between the two groups

Original publication

Prolonged vs intermittent intravenous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for patients with sepsis: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Ann Intensive Care. Published 5 December 2023. doi:10.1186/s13613-023-01222-w

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.