Respiratory failure & ventilation

Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study

Crit Care MedPublished Retrospective observational study

Authors' conclusion

A P plat visually stable for at least 2 seconds leads to reliable C rs calculation during assisted MV.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18 y) in a Neuro-ICU of a tertiary referral hospital with Crs measured in controlled and assisted mechanical ventilation (MV) within 60 minutes
Participants
101 adults
Exposure
Crs calculation during assisted vs controlled MV
Outcome
Agreement of Crs, assisted vs controlled MV (Bland-Altman)
Methodological detailssingle-center
  • Single-center

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Bland-Altman bias

−3.9

Upper level of agreement

21.6

Lower level of agreement

−29.6

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Crs

P = 0.006

Crs by peak pressure lower or higher than Pplat (subgroup)

No statistical difference in Crs (assisted vs controlled MV) when peak pressure was lower or higher than Pplat

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study. Crit Care Med. Published 16 June 2023. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005964

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.