Organ support & nutrition

Sex Differences in Vital Organ Support Provided to ICU Patients*

Crit Care MedPublished Retrospective observational study

Main finding · Invasive ventilationResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 0.64 99% CI 0.63–0.65

Authors' conclusion

Women received significantly less vital organ support than men in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand.

Study context

Population
Adult ICU admissions in the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database 2018–2021
Participants
699,535 ICU admissions
Exposure
Women vs men
Outcome
Provision of invasive ventilation
Methodological detailsregistry-based, multicentre, 199 ICUs
  • Registry-based
  • Multicentre
  • 199 ICUs

Main finding

Invasive ventilation

Odds ratio

0.64

99% CI 0.63–0.65

Women vs Men
OR 0.64 (99% CI 0.63–0.65)

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeOR (99% CI)
Hospital mortality, overallAdjusted0.94 (0.91–0.97)
Hospital mortality, no organ support (subgroup)Adjusted0.82 (0.76–0.88)
Hospital mortality, any organ support (subgroup)Adjusted1.01 (0.97–1.04)

Other organ support (NIV, vasoactive medication, RRT, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), any)

Women less likely than men to receive each other organ support except ECMO
  • Adjusted

Hospital mortality, any organ support (subgroup)

Women and men equally likely to die

Original publication

Sex Differences in Vital Organ Support Provided to ICU Patients*. Crit Care Med. Published 16 October 2023. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006058

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.