Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study

Intensive Care MedPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

Standardised qualitative and quantitative assessments of CT are reliable and feasible methods to predict poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest.

Study context

Population
Adult unconscious patients after OHCA with routine head computed tomography (CT) > 48 h ≤ 7 days post-arrest75% poor outcome
Participants
140 patients
Comparison
Qualitative assessment vs GWR-8 vs GWR-4 vs Automated GWR
Outcome
Prognostic accuracy for poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6)
Methodological detailsprospective, international, multicentre, observational, within the TTM2 trial, raters blinded to clinical information, pre-published protocol
  • Prospective
  • International
  • Multicentre
  • Observational
  • Within the TTM2 trial
  • Raters blinded to clinical information
  • Pre-published protocol

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6)
Test or modelAUCSensitivity (median)
Standardised qualitative— not stated in the abstract37%
GWR-8— not stated in the abstract39%
GWR-4— not stated in the abstract30%
Automated GWR0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.91)41%

AUC

Standardised qualitative— not stated in the abstract
GWR-8— not stated in the abstract
GWR-4— not stated in the abstract
Automated GWR0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.91)

Sensitivity (median)

Standardised qualitative37%
GWR-839%
GWR-430%
Automated GWR41%

— not stated in the abstract

Standardised qualitative assessment and all GWR models: specificity
100% (95% CI 90-100)

Original publication

Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study. Intensive Care Med. Published 20 June 2024. doi:10.1007/s00134-024-07497-2

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.