Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

The Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Resuscitation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*

Crit Care MedPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Pooled result · 28-day mortalityResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.88 95% CI 0.78–0.99

Authors' conclusion

POCUS-guided resuscitation in shock may yield important patient and health system benefits.

Study context

Population
Adults with shock18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Comparison
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-guided resuscitation vs control
Outcome
28-day mortality
Follow-up
28 days
Methodological detailsMEDLINE, Embase and unpublished sources searched from inception to December 2023
  • MEDLINE, Embase and unpublished sources searched from inception to December 2023

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.88

95% CI 0.78–0.99

POCUS vs Control
RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78–0.99)

Further pooled results

OutcomeMean difference (d) (95% CI)
Duration of vasoactive medicationLow to moderate certainty−0.73 (−1.16 to −0.30)
OutcomeRR (95% CI)
Need for RRTLow to moderate certainty0.80 (0.63–1.02)

Lactate clearance

Probably improved with POCUS-guided resuscitation (high certainty)

IV fluid (IVF) administration and inotropes

Little to no changes in administration of IVF (low to high certainty) or inotropes (high certainty)

Physicians' plans for IVF and vasoactive medication

Slightly influenced by POCUS (moderate certainty)

CT scans and diagnostic echocardiograms

May be no change in CT scans (low certainty); probably fewer diagnostic echocardiograms (moderate certainty)

ICU or hospital admissions, ICU and hospital LOS, need for mechanical ventilation (MV)

May be little to no difference (low to moderate certainty)

AKI, duration of MV or renal replacement therapy (RRT)

Uncertain effect (very low certainty)

Original publication

The Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Resuscitation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*. Crit Care Med. Published 18 September 2024. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006399

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.