Regional anesthesia

Comparison of migration rates between traditional and tunneled adductor canal block catheters: a randomized controlled trial

Reg Anesth Pain MedPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

ISAFE group had a significantly lower rate of dislodgement at 24 hours.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty with continuous adductor canal block
Participants
97 patients
Comparison
ISAFE approach vs conventional adductor canal catheter insertion
Primary endpoint
Catheter dislodged to outside the adductor canal on ultrasound
Follow-up
24 hours after surgery

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

P = 0.01

Secondary outcomes

Pain scores at rest · first two postoperative days

Lower pain scores at rest with ISAFE

Original publication

Comparison of migration rates between traditional and tunneled adductor canal block catheters: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published 13 September 2023. doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-104654

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.