Comparison of migration rates between traditional and tunneled adductor canal block catheters: a randomized controlled trial
Authors' conclusion
ISAFE group had a significantly lower rate of dislodgement at 24 hours.
Study context
- Population
- Patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty with continuous adductor canal block
- Participants
- 97 patients
- Comparison
- ISAFE approach vs conventional adductor canal catheter insertion
- Primary endpoint
- Catheter dislodged to outside the adductor canal on ultrasound
- Follow-up
- 24 hours after surgery
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
P = 0.01
Secondary outcomes
Pain scores at rest · first two postoperative days
- Lower pain scores at rest with ISAFE
Original publication
Comparison of migration rates between traditional and tunneled adductor canal block catheters: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published 13 September 2023. doi:10. 1136/ rapm-2023-104654
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →