Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Continuous and Noninvasive Total Blood Hemoglobin Measurement Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectrometry

Anesth AnalgPublished Method comparison study

Authors' conclusion

The exploratory study shows that the NIRS based tHb provided an accurate measurement of tHb in cardiac surgery patients.

Study context

Population
Cardiac surgery patientsincluded in the analysis
Participants
189 patients
Comparison
Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)-based continuous total hemoglobin (tHb) vs blood gas tHb
Methodological detailspost hoc retrospective analysis, multicentre (3 clinical sites), exploratory
  • Post hoc retrospective analysis
  • Multicentre (3 clinical sites)
  • Exploratory

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Agreement of NIRS-based tHb vs blood gas tHb
Bias (mean difference), g/dL
0.08 (95% CI 0.02-0.19)
Precision (1 SD of the difference), g/dL
1.01 (95% CI 0.93-1.09)
Limits of agreement, g/dL
−1.90 and 2.06
Mean absolute error (MAE), g/dL (0.69-0.91)
0.79
Root mean square error (RMSE), g/dL (0.94-1.30)
1.12
4-quadrant concordance, % (79.8-92.1)
86.1
Error-grid: measurements in green zone
84%
Error-grid: measurements in red zone
0%

Original publication

Continuous and Noninvasive Total Blood Hemoglobin Measurement Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectrometry. Anesth Analg. Published 2 July 2025. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000007618

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.