Epidemiology and outcomes of early versus late septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study
Authors' conclusion
AKI is almost ubiquitous in septic critically ill patients and present within two days of admission. The timing from ICU admission might not be relevant to distinguish different phenotypes of SA-AKI.
Study context
- Population
- Adults admitted for sepsis to a tertiary ICU, 2010–2020, excluding chronic dialysis or no consent1,660 (90%) with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI)
- Participants
- 1,835 adults
- Exposure
- Early vs late sepsis-associated AKI
- Early SA-AKIn = 1,610reference
- Late SA-AKIn = 50
- Outcome
- Relative frequency of early and late SA-AKI (KDIGO criteria)
Methodological detailssingle-centre, tertiary ICU, sensitivity analyses
- Single-centre
- Tertiary ICU
- Sensitivity analyses
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
- SA-AKI criteria fulfilled
- 1660 (90%)
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Early vs late SA-AKI frequency, AKI with elevated sCr only (sensitivity analysis)
Early vs late SA-AKI frequency, severe AKI only (sensitivity analysis)
Age · late SA-AKI younger
P < 0.001
Median
| Outcome | Early SA-AKI | Late SA-AKI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charlson comorbidity index | 5 (IQR 3–7) | 3 (IQR 1–5) | P < 0.001 |
| SAPSII score | 53 (IQR 43–64) | 41 (IQR 34–50) | P < 0.001 |
| In-hospital mortalitySimilar | P = 0.75 |
Early vs late SA-AKI frequency, severe AKI only (sensitivity analysis)
- Similar proportions with different time windows for early SA-AKI
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →