Organ support & nutrition

Initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury: a secondary analysis of STARRT-AKI trial

Intensive Care MedPublished Secondary analysis of the STARRT-AKI randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

In critically ill patients with severe AKI, initiation of CRRT, as compared to IHD, was associated with a significant reduction in the composite outcome of death or RRT dependence at 90-days.

Study context

Population
Critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in the STARRT-AKI trial
Participants
1,590 vs 606
Comparison
Initial continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) vs intermittent hemodialysis (IHD)
  • CRRTn = 1,590
  • IHDn = 606reference
Primary endpoint
Composite of:
  • Death
  • RRT dependence
Follow-up
90 days after randomization
Methodological detailspropensity score, inverse probability of treatment with overlap-weighting
  • Propensity score
  • Inverse probability of treatment with overlap-weighting

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

CRRT vs IHDEstimate (95% CI)
CRRT
unadjusted OR 0.90(0.75–1.09)
Overlap-weighted
OR 0.81(0.66–0.99)

Further findings

OutcomeOR (95% CI)
RRT dependence · 90 days0.61 (0.39–0.94)

Original publication

Initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury: a secondary analysis of STARRT-AKI trial. Intensive Care Med. Published 10 October 2023. doi:10.1007/s00134-023-07211-8

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.