Respiratory failure & ventilation

Interventions with a significant mortality difference in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and comparison with Guidelines

J Crit CarePublished Systematic review of randomised controlled trials with comparison with guidelines

Authors' conclusion

This systematic review highlights potential gaps between RCTs results and Guidelines that could be used to plan future research or highlight topics to be discussed in future Guidelines.

Study context

Population
Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting a statistically significant mortality difference33 RCTs
Comparison
RCT results on mortality vs European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) Guidelines recommendations
Outcome
Interventions with mortality difference in ARDS

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Interventions with mortality difference
23
Invasive ventilation strategies
7
Noninvasive ventilation strategies
2
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
1
Drugs
12
Nutritional support
1
RCTs with mortality reduction
25/33 (76%)
RCTs with mortality increase
8/33 (24%)
Interventions not mentioned by Guidelines with reduced mortality
8
Further interventions not mentioned by Guidelines with increased mortality
5

Further pooled results

Trial characteristics

Multicenter studies
24/33 (73%)
Blinded studies
19/33 (58%)

Original publication

Interventions with a significant mortality difference in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and comparison with Guidelines. J Crit Care. Published 11 August 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2026.155703

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.