Sepsis & infection

The Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Septic Patients

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Observational cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In septic patients, the combination of elevated PVR and RVSD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. However, neither PVR elevation nor RVSD alone was significantly associated with 30-day mortality.

Study context

Population
Septic patients in a tertiary hospital ICU
Participants
638 patients
Exposure
RV systolic dysfunction (RVSD) and/or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) elevation vs normal right ventricular (RV) function
  • Normal RV functionn = 205reference
  • Isolated RVSDn = 76
  • Isolated PVR elevationn = 195
  • RVSD + PVR elevationn = 162
Outcome
30-day mortality
Follow-up
30 days
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Each group vs normal RV functionHazard ratio (95% CI)P value
RVSD + PVR elevationCox regression, independent association
2.907(1.385–6.100)
P = 0.005
Isolated RVSD
0.617(0.168–2.274)
P = 0.468
Isolated PVR elevation
1.074(0.469–2.461)
P = 0.865

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
30-day mortality, PVR >2.0 vs ≤2.0 WU, patients with RVSD (subgroup)3.878 (1.139–13.203)P = 0.030
30-day mortality, PVR >2.0 vs ≤2.0 WU, normal RV systolic function (subgroup)1.632 (0.793–3.358)P = 0.183

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

The Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Septic Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 8 June 2025. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.012

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.