Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

The prognostic value of postoperative cardiac troponin I and T for major adverse cardiac events after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review

BJA OpenPublished Systematic review

Authors' conclusion

Postoperative cardiac troponin I and T biomarkers are associated with postoperative MACE after CABG. The current evidence on the predictive value for postoperative MACE is insufficient to use troponin I and T for risk stratification.

Study context

Population
Patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery10 studies
Participants
1,956 vs 5,615
Comparison
Postoperative cardiac troponin I and T as prognostic markers for major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
  • Troponin In = 1,956
  • Troponin Tn = 5,615
Outcome
MACE:
  • MI
  • Coronary artery revascularisation
  • Cardiac death
  • Non-fatal cardiac arrest
  • HF
Methodological detailsRisk of bias moderate to high across domains (Quality in Prognostic Studies tool)
  • Risk of bias moderate to high across domains (Quality in Prognostic Studies tool)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Association of increased postoperative troponin with MACE
GroupHR range (n=2 studies)OR range (n=5 studies)
Troponin I1.6-11.1
Troponin T0.9-67.9

HR range (n=2 studies)

Troponin I1.6-11.1
Troponin T— not stated in the abstract

OR range (n=5 studies)

Troponin I— not stated in the abstract
Troponin T0.9-67.9

Further pooled results

OutcomeTroponin ITroponin T
Discriminative performance (c-statistics)
C-statistics range (n=3 studies)0.60-0.810.72-0.77
Calibration
Hosmer-Lemeshow P (in-hospital MACE, n=1 study)— not stated in the abstractP=0.20

— not stated in the abstract

Discriminative performance (c-statistics)

Moderate to good for troponin I; moderate for troponin T

Calibration

No studies reported calibration for troponin I; good calibration for troponin T

Original publication

The prognostic value of postoperative cardiac troponin I and T for major adverse cardiac events after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review. BJA Open. Published 8 September 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100484

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.