Thoracic impedance pneumography in propofol-sedated patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, randomized trial
Primary result · Hypoxic episodesResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 0.47Authors' conclusion
Additional thoracic impedance pneumography reduced the quantity and extent of hypoxic events with less need of assisted ventilation.
Study context
- Population
- Patients undergoing PEG placement under propofol sedation by gastroenterologists or trained nurses; mostly oncological indication, ASA II–III
- Participants
- 173 patients
- Comparison
- Additional thoracic impedance pneumography vs standard monitoring
- Primary endpoint
- Hypoxic episodes (SpO2 < 90% for >15 s)
Methodological detailssingle-centre
- Single-centre
Primary result
Hypoxic episodes
Odds ratio
0.47
P = 0.016
By group
As reported in the abstract
Secondary outcomes
Apnea >10s detected
P < 0.001
Apnea >30s detected
P = 0.014
Assisted ventilation needed
P = 0.053
| Outcome | TIM | SM | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal SpO2 per procedure | 90.0% ± 8.9 | 84.0% ± 17.6 | P = 0.007 |
| Adjustments of oxygen flowSignificantly more often necessary in SM | P = 0.034 |
- Apnea >30s detected — Time advantage before hypoxic events
- 17 s
Additional cost of thoracic impedance pneumography per procedure
- Calculated cost per procedure
- 0.13$ (0.12 €/0.11 £)
Original publication
Thoracic impedance pneumography in propofol-sedated patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. Published 17 February 2024. doi:10. 1016/ j. jclinane. 2024. 111403
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →