Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Appraisal of Postoperative Outcomes of Volatile and Intravenous Anesthetics: A Network Meta-Analysis of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Authors' conclusion

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, sevoflurane with propofol was associated with decreased ICU LOS compared with propofol monotherapy. Midazolam with propofol increased ICU LOS compared with propofol alone.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18) undergoing cardiac surgery (analyses restricted to cardiac surgery)
Participants
8,085 adults · 53 RCTs
Comparison
Volatile and/or intravenous anaesthetic regimens vs propofol monotherapy for maintenance of anesthesia
Outcome
Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS)
Methodological detailsfrequentist, random-effects, PRISMA-NMA, RoB-2 and CINeMA appraisal
  • Frequentist
  • Random-effects
  • PRISMA-NMA
  • RoB-2 and CINeMA appraisal

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Each group vs propofolMD, hours (95% CI)
Sevoflurane + propofol
−18.26(−34.78 to −1.73)
Midazolam + propofol
17.51(2.78–32.25)

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR (95% CI)
Myocardial infarctionMidazolam vs Propofol1.94 (1.01–3.71)
  • Myocardial infarction: 27 trials (N = 4,080; 10 arms; I2 = 0%)

In-hospital and 30-day mortality, stroke, delirium

No significant differences across other outcomes

Original publication

Appraisal of Postoperative Outcomes of Volatile and Intravenous Anesthetics: A Network Meta-Analysis of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 17 July 2023. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2023.07.011

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.