Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Effects of Balanced Versus Saline-based Solutions on Acute Kidney Injury in Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

In patients undergoing off-pump bypass surgery with a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate, the intraoperative balanced solution-based chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy did not decrease the rate of postoperative acute kidney injury compared with the saline-based chloride-liberal intravenous fluid administration strategy.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing off-pump CABG with normal eGFR, single tertiary care center, June 2014–July 2020
Participants
180 vs 178
Comparison
Balanced vs Saline
  • Balancedn = 180
  • Salinen = 178reference
Primary endpoint
AKI (2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline)
Follow-up
Within 7 postoperative days
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Each group vs salineRisk difference (95% CI)
Balanced
−2.86%(−7.72% to 2.01%)
Each group vs salineRelative risk (95% CI)P value
Balanced
0.61(0.26–1.43)
P = 0.35

Further findings

Saline group had higher intraoperative serum chloride and lower base excess, resulting in lower pH, vs balanced group

Original publication

Effects of Balanced Versus Saline-based Solutions on Acute Kidney Injury in Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 4 June 2024. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.06.001

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.