Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia
Negative-Pressure Lung Re-expansion After One-Lung Ventilation for Pulmonary Resection: A Retrospective Study
Authors' conclusion
Negative-pressure lung re-expansion was not associated with increased adverse events compared with conventional positive-pressure re-expansion after one-lung ventilation for minimally invasive lung resection.
Study context
- Population
- Patients undergoing OLV for minimally invasive lung resection, single tertiary care hospital
- Participants
- 242 vs 152
- Exposure
- Negative- vs positive-pressure lung re-expansion after OLV
- Negative-pressure re-expansionn = 242
- Positive-pressure re-expansionn = 152reference
- Outcome
- Early postoperative atelectasis, lung contusion, pulmonary edema
Methodological detailssingle-centre
- Single-centre
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
- No statistically significant differences between groups
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Overall complications and respiratory complications · 30 days
- No differences between groups
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Negative-Pressure Lung Re-expansion After One-Lung Ventilation for Pulmonary Resection: A Retrospective Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 17 June 2026. doi:10. 1053/ j. jvca. 2026. 06. 021
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →